Dancing Euclidean Proofs: Introducing Embodied Mathematics Into the Classroom

    The first think I noticed when watching the Dancing Euclidean Proofs video and reading the paper was my resistance to the arguments made therein. As I continued to read the paper, I also tried to consider where this resistance came from, and whether and to what extent it was warranted. 

    I think that part of my resistance comes from my long exposure to mathematics as it is currently done, and I think this impacted my reaction towards the video and article in two ways. First, culturally, I was very accustom to mathematics done the ‘traditional way’, with written or visual, but atemporal, representations. Because I am so accustom to the traditional way of understanding and of doing mathematics, I found myself resisting the idea that ‘dancing mathematics’ could be edifying, even in the face of evidence given in the paper that multi-sensory learning helps students to better internalize and understand mathematics. 

    The second way that my long exposure to mathematics coloured my initial opinion of embodied math is that, certainly relative to students, I have a lot of experience with math; I am very used to written mathematics, and to learning mathematics through papers and textbooks, and it has always worked well enough for me. As a result, I had a harder time seeing how embodying mathematics would be helpful to me personally. I had similar feelings when doing the activity in-class. Though it was an interesting change from the math learning I was used to, I don’t think I found it personally more enlightening.

    After having reflected, though, I think I can see clear value in having students engage in embodying mathematics. Essentially, I agree with what is said in the video and the paper about the learning value of having to choreograph and perform the proofs as dances. I think that it requires learners to spend a good deal more time carefully digesting the proof, deciding which steps are essential and why, why the steps must occur in a certain order, etc. Though dance is probably not the optimal vehicle for all, or even most, parts of the mathematics curriculum, incorporating multi-sensory, experiential ways for students to engage with the curriculum seems like and excellent way to enhance comprehension and retention of the material. 

    Finally, I think it was interesting that Samuel and Azul had to problem-solve how to actually embody the proofs using the spaces and material available to them. In generally, I think that one of the most important skills students should be learning in mathematics is how to problem-solve, and clearly a good deal of problem-solving was required on the part of the dancers in this project. Aside from having to figure out how to choreograph Euclid’s proofs, they also had to work with the constraints of their environment to produce their dance (using shells and sticks, drawing with their feet in the sand, etc.).  


Comments

  1. I appreciate that you are noticing and writing about the tensions that you feel in relation to this piece. Enhancing comprehension is an interesting notion for mathematics. Deeply learning, through embodiment is different than most abstract written work, as you point out. Value for spending time with a mathematical concept is not usually found in schools which prize quantity and efficiency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

From the Eye of Horus to Grothendieck Primes: Math and Mythology

Reflection on Assignment 1

What's in a Name: On the Acknowledgement of Non-European Mathematical Traditions in the Classroom